<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steve McVey &#8211; Who Accepted Whom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/05/steve-mcvey-who-accepted-whom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/05/steve-mcvey-who-accepted-whom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/05/steve-mcvey-who-accepted-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/05/steve-mcvey-who-accepted-whom/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Yes you are correct! It makes sense seeing He wanted us to be restored to Him and the sin issue to be resolved and He is the only one that could achieve this for us.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes you are correct! It makes sense seeing He wanted us to be restored to Him and the sin issue to be resolved and He is the only one that could achieve this for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purecommunity</title>
		<link>http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/05/steve-mcvey-who-accepted-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>purecommunity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/05/steve-mcvey-who-accepted-whom/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t that be interesting! I think his description is more accurate. Christ accepts us and we get to share in that. Saying the opposite, that we accept Christ, may give a good feeling to those who are in the free-will camp, which is okay. But our acceptance really isn&#039;t the issue. The issue is being accepted by God, which is what the cross is all about! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#39;t that be interesting! I think his description is more accurate. Christ accepts us and we get to share in that. Saying the opposite, that we accept Christ, may give a good feeling to those who are in the free-will camp, which is okay. But our acceptance really isn&#39;t the issue. The issue is being accepted by God, which is what the cross is all about!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/05/steve-mcvey-who-accepted-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/05/steve-mcvey-who-accepted-whom/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I like what he has said about not Christ coming into my life but Christ accepting me into His. That makes more sense to me. We just need now for churches over the world to change their terminology and theology on this one and to practice it the way Steve has in his article.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like what he has said about not Christ coming into my life but Christ accepting me into His. That makes more sense to me. We just need now for churches over the world to change their terminology and theology on this one and to practice it the way Steve has in his article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
