<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changing the Pornography Landscape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/19/changing-the-pornography-landscape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/19/changing-the-pornography-landscape/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jglisson73</title>
		<link>http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/19/changing-the-pornography-landscape/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>jglisson73</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/19/changing-the-pornography-landscape/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Indeed, it is a debate. I am of the opinion that it is a slippery slope to begin regulating forms of speech. Regardless of what the founding fathers intended, we have to re-contextualize the constitution into contemporary issues. Thus far, it has proved an enduring document and the principles contained in it have translated well into our post-modern society. 
 
Ultimately, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness looks different to different people. There are lots of things that people engage in that I believe lead to bondage rather than freedom. However, their right to choose is something that I would never want to remove from them. If I condone removing such a right to choose from others, what is going to prevent others from removing rights from me that they deem distasteful, such as my religious freedom? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, it is a debate. I am of the opinion that it is a slippery slope to begin regulating forms of speech. Regardless of what the founding fathers intended, we have to re-contextualize the constitution into contemporary issues. Thus far, it has proved an enduring document and the principles contained in it have translated well into our post-modern society. </p>
<p>Ultimately, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness looks different to different people. There are lots of things that people engage in that I believe lead to bondage rather than freedom. However, their right to choose is something that I would never want to remove from them. If I condone removing such a right to choose from others, what is going to prevent others from removing rights from me that they deem distasteful, such as my religious freedom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/19/changing-the-pornography-landscape/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purecommunity.org/2009/02/19/changing-the-pornography-landscape/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>There has long been a debate about whether pornography is protected speech under the first amendment.  It is quite different speech from political or religious speech, clearly what the founding father&#039;s intended.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has long been a debate about whether pornography is protected speech under the first amendment.  It is quite different speech from political or religious speech, clearly what the founding father&#039;s intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
